Key findings
Technology momentum · top 8
Strongest topic convergence
Registry growth since inception
Historical checkpoints from the first supplier-register seed (26 Jun 2026) to the current R641 analytical state. Each layer begins only when a comparable metric exists; downward patent steps reflect family normalization/deduplication, not record loss.
Growth of the 13 registry branches
First fully synchronized 13-topic bibliography checkpoint: 23 Sep 2026. The chart tracks accepted topic-row counts through R641.
N01Technology Dynamics
Publications by year
Mapped patent families by priority year
Research institutions
Geographic specialization
N02Topic Intersection Matrix
N03Technology Convergence
Accelerating pair overlaps
Selected pair — shared publications over time
N04Science ↔ Patent ↔ Industry
These values are not additive: they are three different scale signals. Publications are exact R641 data; patents and industrial supplier counts are thematic mappings.
N05Technology Momentum
Combined momentum ranking
2016–2020 → 2021–2025
N06Emerging Technologies — automatic discovery
There is no predefined technology list here. Candidates are extracted automatically from current R641 publication titles as 2–5-word phrases, then compared across 2016–2020 and 2021–2025, with 2026 shown separately. Patent and industry counts are support signals based on exact normalized phrase matching, not new canonical relationships.
Top automatically discovered concepts
Stage distribution
Selected concept — literature trajectory
Why it surfaced
Discovery method
N07Declining / Saturating Technologies
Topic-level trajectories
Concepts with saturation / mixed signals
N10Research Institution Landscape
Cross-topic research-institution bridges
Research institutions by topic
N11Geography of Technology
Specialization for selected topic
Strong robust country-topic specializations
LQ > 1 means the topic is more concentrated in that country than in the mapped industrial corpus overall. RF is excluded from public-facing output.
N12Patent–Literature Lag
Lag is the difference between the activity centers of patenting and literature over 2000–2025. A positive lag means patent activity occurs later than literature activity. This is an association, not causality.
N13Industrialization Gap
The log-normalized scale of literature plus mapped patents is compared with the mapped industrial supplier footprint. A positive value means the knowledge/IP layer is broader than the industrial footprint in this thematic model.
N14Technology Opportunity Map
This is not a commercial forecast. The score is a heuristic whitespace indicator combining growth, recent activity, patent evidence, and relative scarcity of industrial signals.